52 lines
1.7 KiB
Org Mode
52 lines
1.7 KiB
Org Mode
#+title: Licensing on metanohi
|
|
#&summary
|
|
What's up with all that stuff?
|
|
#&
|
|
#+startup: showall
|
|
#+license: wtfpl
|
|
|
|
Previous opinion: <@eval macros.titlelink('/writings/non-copylefted')@>.
|
|
|
|
* Licensing on metanohi
|
|
|
|
I usually just use the Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License, Version 2
|
|
from [[http://wtfpl.net/]]:
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC
|
|
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
|
|
Version 2, December 2004
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net>
|
|
|
|
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified
|
|
copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long
|
|
as the name is changed.
|
|
|
|
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
|
|
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION
|
|
|
|
0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Reason
|
|
|
|
I got tired of software and culture licenses. I don't mind them, and I don't
|
|
have anything against copyleft -- it's a tool, and it can be effective in some
|
|
cases -- but for my own projects, I just want to publish something that people
|
|
can use.
|
|
|
|
I still ask for attribution, but I do it in a nice way, and not with the
|
|
implicit threat of a license. If someone doesn't attribute me, it makes no
|
|
difference to me whether they have to because of a license; I'm not going to do
|
|
anything about it anyway.
|
|
|
|
I guess that some people consider e.g. CC BY-SA a recognizable symbol and that
|
|
its law stuff is secondary. I can follow that thought, but I just got tired of
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
Some might not want to integrate WTFPL code into their project, but fuck them.
|
|
|
|
All that being said, I will work in any free software and free culture project
|
|
no matter what license they use. WTFPL is just for my junk.
|