291 lines
10 KiB
Org Mode
291 lines
10 KiB
Org Mode
#+title: Na
|
|
#&summary
|
|
A new spoken and written language in development.
|
|
#&
|
|
#+license: bysa
|
|
#&toc
|
|
|
|
* Na
|
|
|
|
** Introduction
|
|
|
|
Na is a probalistic language. The more details you use when explaining an
|
|
event, the more probable it is that the recipient understands you. This is not
|
|
very different from typical languages ("a blue building" is more precise than
|
|
"a building"), but the new thing in Na is that this guesswork is everywhere.
|
|
|
|
** Alphabet
|
|
|
|
Optimally, Na should have its own alphabet. To aid in its spreading, a subset
|
|
of the Latin alphabet has been chosen instead:
|
|
|
|
: . A E I O B D F G K L N S T V
|
|
|
|
All of these letters are pronounced as "short sounds", i.e. "A" is not
|
|
pronounced as "AAY", but just "AE". This is the same for all wovels. There are
|
|
two types of correct syllables: those of the form <consonant><wovel> and those
|
|
of the form <wovel>: "LO" is legal, "LOO", "LLA", "LOI", "AV", and "AEV" are
|
|
not. Aside from letters, only the period (".") character and space between
|
|
characters are used. No commas, no colons, no semicolons, nothing else. Also,
|
|
there is no difference between uppercase and lowercase letters. Sentences are
|
|
read left-to-right (numbers are written right-to-left; more about that later).
|
|
|
|
With only 4 wovels and 10 consonants pronouncations can be very varied and
|
|
still correct. According to the rules laid out above there are 40 different
|
|
single-syllable words, 40^2 = 1,600 two-syllable words, 40^3 = 64,000
|
|
three-syllable words, 40^4 = 2,560,000 four-syllable words, etc. At ten
|
|
syllables (an extreme case) there are 10,485,760,000,000,000 different
|
|
10-syllable words and a total number of 10,754,625,641,025,640
|
|
any-number-of-syllables-less-or-equal-to-10 words.
|
|
|
|
|
|
*** TODO IPA/SAMPA
|
|
|
|
The author of this document is not very familiar with IPA, SAMPA, or any other
|
|
phonetic alphabet.
|
|
|
|
** Goals
|
|
|
|
Na wants to be a useful language somewhat usable by people. Na has been
|
|
designed to be fairly global, but since the creator of Na is fluent only in
|
|
Germanic languages (Danish and English), and because the Latin alphabet is
|
|
used, Na is non-global. Nevertheless, it /wants/ to be global.
|
|
|
|
** Basics
|
|
|
|
Na has no nouns, no verbs, no adjectives, no adverbiums, no pronouns, etc. In
|
|
Na, the core of everything is a word more or less equivalent to the English
|
|
word "existence". This word is *BA*. All other words are based on this base
|
|
word (in object oriented programming language terminology, this is equivalent
|
|
to subclassing classes).
|
|
|
|
The groups at the first levels of heritance are:
|
|
+ Existence :: BA
|
|
+ Number :: BE + Real number :: BEBA
|
|
+ Integer :: BEBE + Fraction :: BEBI
|
|
+ Imaginary number :: BEBO + Complex number :: BEDA
|
|
+ Symbol :: BI + Letter :: BIBA
|
|
+ Shape :: BO + Relation :: DA
|
|
+ Identity :: DE + Absolute combiner :: DO
|
|
+ Identifier :: FA + Relative combiner :: FE
|
|
|
|
|
|
TODO: Improve on groups.
|
|
|
|
These have been chosen not because of perfection, but because Na was designed
|
|
for human beings (who are not perfect). Nevertheless, these groups should
|
|
suffice for the time being.
|
|
|
|
*Note:* These groups are few on purpose. Many words fit into several
|
|
groups. Groups are only good for basic things; more complex meanings do not
|
|
have to be placed in any group.
|
|
|
|
Na uses a combination of numbers, identifiers and further subclassing to
|
|
achieve (some) usability. In Na, what is written as one sentence in
|
|
e.g. English, can often become more than one sentence. To make a statement in
|
|
Na, one splits one's sentence into Na sentences, the first ones consisting of
|
|
definitions and assignments (named variables), and the final one consisting of
|
|
everything put together in the right order. Often, the order does not matter,
|
|
and the purpose of the final sentence is really just to point out what
|
|
definitions you have chosen to use, and that you are done.
|
|
|
|
For example, to write "I see a table." in Na, you first extract the objects (in
|
|
Na, everything is an object) from the sentence. This gives us:
|
|
|
|
+ I, the subject
|
|
+ see, the verb
|
|
+ a table, the object
|
|
|
|
In Na, this is simplified further into:
|
|
+ I
|
|
+ to see
|
|
+ table, 1
|
|
|
|
The only two possible sense-making combinations using all the words would be to
|
|
say "I see a table" or "The table sees me". To stress that the first version is
|
|
wanted, we first combine "I" and "to see", which we then combine with a
|
|
definition of "table, 1". Finally, we throw the definitions together, so that
|
|
people will understand that the sentence is over.
|
|
|
|
To specify "I", we use one of the members from the identity (*DE*) group. "to
|
|
see" is also an abstraction, because the "I" can see in different ways (if it's
|
|
a camera, it doesn't use a human brain to see, for example). Other,
|
|
non-generalized terms are also available, but they are not part of the
|
|
abstraction group.
|
|
|
|
To create a variable to hold "table, 1", you combine the number 1 with a
|
|
generic table defined using the shape (*BO*) group.
|
|
|
|
A sentence where you combine words into a new word has this structure:
|
|
|
|
: <word 1> <word 2>[ <word 3>[...]] DO <new word>.
|
|
|
|
This is an absolute combination. It is also possible to make relative
|
|
combinations where word mixes are not saved in new words:
|
|
|
|
: <word 1> <word 2>[...] FE <word(s)>[ ...].
|
|
|
|
In these relative cases, the words before an FE mark are evaluated when FE is
|
|
reached. If FE is left out from such sentences, everything will be evaluated at
|
|
once. Programmers might find it helpful to think of FE as a stack resetter.
|
|
|
|
When you do not use the *DO* or *FE* combiner, you state something:
|
|
|
|
: <word 1>[ <word 2>[...]].
|
|
|
|
In real languages, this is the equivalent of actually expressing something ---
|
|
combines do not express anything, they merely aid in preparing for later
|
|
expressions.
|
|
|
|
** Example 1: I see a table
|
|
|
|
One can write "I see a table." in two ways: the absolute way with *DO* or the
|
|
relative way with *FE*.
|
|
|
|
Words for "I", "to see", and "table" have not yet been made, but we assume they
|
|
are BIGUHA, NULASE, and GAVOTI, respectively. The integer 1 is FA BEBE B.
|
|
|
|
*** Absolute way
|
|
|
|
+ Step 1 :: Combine "I" and "to see" into a sentence using combinations from
|
|
different groups. Give it a name, e.g. VAVO.
|
|
+ Step 2 :: Combine the number 1 from the integer (*BEBE*) group with the table
|
|
from the shape group. Give it a name, e.g. GALO.
|
|
+ Step 3 :: a) Write VAVO GALO, or b) combine VAVO and GALO into e.g. VALO
|
|
(could be any word) and go to step four.
|
|
+ Step 4 :: Write VALO.
|
|
|
|
So:
|
|
|
|
: biguha nulase do vavo. gavoti fa bebe b do galo. vavo galo do valo. valo.
|
|
|
|
or, shorter:
|
|
|
|
: biguha nulase do vavo. gavoti fa bebe b do galo. vavo galo.
|
|
|
|
The advantage of the first variation is that VALO can be reused again and again
|
|
until people have forgotten what its temporary meaning is. For example, if you
|
|
are telling a story where the main character often sees a table, you could do
|
|
this:
|
|
|
|
: valo. valo. valo. valo. valo.
|
|
|
|
It is not necessary to define new combinations all the time. Na comes with a
|
|
small built-in set of combinations which is required learning for all Na
|
|
speakers. These built-in definitions should be used whenever possible,
|
|
eventually in subclassed or changed forms, to make it easier to write --- and
|
|
especially speak --- Na.
|
|
|
|
*** Relative way
|
|
|
|
The relative way is a bit simpler, shorter and easier to say:
|
|
|
|
: biguha nulase fa bebe b fe gavoti.
|
|
|
|
In fact, this relative sentence can be made into an absolute sentence:
|
|
|
|
: biguha nulase fa bebe b fe gavoti do valo. valo.
|
|
|
|
*** Notes
|
|
|
|
In speech the relative way is much more useful than the absolute one. Both are
|
|
useful, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Identifiers
|
|
|
|
Some of the groups can be used as identifiers. When an identifier is used one
|
|
or more arguments are expected. The integer identifier requires one argument
|
|
(the number), the real number identifier requires two arguments (before and
|
|
after the point), and the letter identifier requires one argument. To use a
|
|
group as an identifier, prefix it with *FA*.
|
|
|
|
** Numbers
|
|
|
|
Numbers in Na are duodecimal, i.e. base 12. The alphabet is used as numbers. A
|
|
is used for zero, the consonants range from 1 to 10, and O is used for 11. When
|
|
specifying a number, it should be prefixed with *FA BEBA* (real numbers) or any
|
|
other name from a subclassed number identifier, and it should be written with
|
|
the least important bit first (LSB). To pronounce a number, speak the letters
|
|
of the number one by one.
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
+ FA BEBE GB = 16
|
|
+ FA BEBE D = 2
|
|
+ FA BEBA D AT = 2.108
|
|
|
|
TODO: Improve this strange system
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Example 2: We transported the ship into another dimension
|
|
|
|
This sentence is a bit tricky. We start by splitting the sentence into
|
|
meaningful parts:
|
|
+ we transport (in the past)
|
|
+ <something specific> ship
|
|
+ into
|
|
+ another dimension
|
|
|
|
Again, base words have not been defined yet, so we assume that "we (generic)"
|
|
(we do not know if it is an exclusive or inclusive we) is GELO, "transport" is
|
|
LOLOTI, the past is BATATO, something specific is SESE, "ship" is MOLOTE,
|
|
"into" is NIKO, "another" is KOBO, and "dimension" is TILE.
|
|
|
|
It appears that it is actually quite easy to create a relative sentence now:
|
|
|
|
: batato gelo loloti fe sese molote niko fe fe tile kobo.
|
|
|
|
Notice the two FE in the end. Without the second FE, the sentence could also
|
|
mean "We transported another dimension into the ship.". It would not be wrong
|
|
to omit the FE, but it would create an ambigious sentence (which can be
|
|
useful).
|
|
|
|
Remember that the following sentence means excactly the same as the previous:
|
|
|
|
: loloti batato gelo fe niko molote sese fe fe kobo tile.
|
|
|
|
Word order is only important in the case of identifiers and their arguments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Example 3: 33+2.4i
|
|
|
|
33+2.4i is a complex number. The x+yi notation doesn't fit well in Na. Instead,
|
|
the *FA BEDA* identifier is used (33+2.4i = 33.0+2.4i):
|
|
|
|
: fa beda td a d g.
|
|
|
|
Again, this is not perfect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
** TODO Foreign words
|
|
|
|
Foreign words present a problem in Na.
|
|
|
|
|
|
** TODO Built-ins
|
|
|
|
~1000 words needed to begin with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Miscellaneous
|
|
|
|
Since there are only 16 characters (14 letters, the period, and space), one
|
|
character can be stored in only 4 bits, and 2 characters can be stored in one
|
|
byte.
|
|
|
|
Because of the infinitely many relatively different ways to say the same thing,
|
|
texts and speech can be varied a great deal. This could be quite useful in
|
|
e.g. poems.
|
|
|