72 lines
2.8 KiB
Org Mode
72 lines
2.8 KiB
Org Mode
#+title: Hardware freedom
|
|
#&summary
|
|
A discussion about hardware freedom. Contains comparisons with software
|
|
freedom.
|
|
#&
|
|
#+license: wtfpl
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/endorsement/criteria
|
|
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/free-bios.html
|
|
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.html
|
|
http://projects.goldelico.com/p/gta04-main/page/FirmwareInjector/?rev=322
|
|
http://www.oreillynet.com/linux/blog/2007/08/the_four_freedoms_applied_to_h.html
|
|
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/09/19/intel-drm-a-crippled.html
|
|
http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/pipermail/discussion/2010-January/001635.html
|
|
http://www.ofb.biz/safari/article/353.html
|
|
http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2006/12/8428.ars
|
|
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100614#feature
|
|
http://libreplanet.org/wiki/When_should_firmware_be_free
|
|
http://www.datamation.com/osrc/article.php/3787736/Proprietary-Firmware-and-the-Pursuit-of-a-Free-Kernel.htm
|
|
https://lwn.net/Articles/352555/
|
|
https://lwn.net/Articles/460654/
|
|
http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/gta04-owner/2011-October/000375.html
|
|
http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/gta04-owner/2011-September/000325.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
centralisering
|
|
|
|
I don't want to depend on something which I cannot control.
|
|
|
|
I don't want to depend on something which I cannot influence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
depend on:
|
|
+ data durability
|
|
+ privacy
|
|
|
|
I like to follow this rule: When I create something substantial which I want to
|
|
share, I host it myself. But why? Because I don't want to depend on something
|
|
which I cannot control.
|
|
|
|
Downside loss of social
|
|
|
|
Requires widespread use of a decentralized social network to share private data
|
|
with a select few.
|
|
|
|
The difficulty of leaving a service is determined by the complexity of the
|
|
social features of the service.
|
|
|
|
I only host my own works somewhere else than on my own host if I feel that I
|
|
have a social obligation to do so, or if it's a link that points out of the
|
|
service. I don't mind if what Facebook ends up being is the new digg.
|
|
|
|
The more difficult it is to leave a service, the more I feel I have a *social*
|
|
obligation to host my works on the service. However, the more difficult it is to
|
|
leave a service, the more I also feel that I have a *moral* obligation to /not/
|
|
host my works on the service.
|
|
|
|
I don't wish to host substantial works, even public ones, on e.g. Facebook. Not
|
|
because Facebook gets to know them (I have made sure I don't mind them being
|
|
public), but because I use a service which I don't like, and that may fuel the
|
|
use in general, especially for my friends. As such, it doesn't matter what I
|
|
publish on the service, it will no matter what (in varying degrees) accelerate
|
|
the use of the service, which I do not want to happen.
|
|
|
|
In general, it's a balance. I try not to make others depend on Facebook because
|
|
of me; I do that by not uploading large photo galleries to Facebook. However,
|
|
photo galleries on Facebook have quite complex features.
|
|
|
|
Collaborative sites
|