Use HTTPS links and also fix a few links.

This commit is contained in:
2020-08-25 22:28:02 +02:00
parent 2028b1ba7c
commit 8ef2a3ae2c
10 changed files with 31 additions and 31 deletions

View File

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ store the list of words on the stack instead of in memory, so words with length
In any case, a word length of 10 would require about 100 MB, a word length of 11
about 1.2 GB, a word length of 12 about 15.6 GB, and a word length of 17 (like
"inconspicuousness") about 16,5 Petabytes (16500000 GB). That's 6,5 Petabytes
*more* than [what the Internet Archive uses](http://archive.org/web/petabox.php)
*more* than [what the Internet Archive uses](https://archive.org/web/petabox.php)
to store millions of websites, books, video and audio.
So perhaps neither my algorithm nor my implementation was that good.
@@ -371,4 +371,4 @@ Preprocess the dictionary into a clever data structure and don't use up all the
memory.
Originally published
[here](http://dikutal.metanohi.name/artikler/old-junk-code-word-finder).
[here](https://dikutal.metanohi.name/artikler/old-junk-code-word-finder).