sider

site/about/index.org

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ This is metanohi, the personal website of [[./niels][Niels G. W. Serup]].
 
 In general, text, images, code and any other type of work on metanohi are
 available under the [[http://www.wtfpl.net/][Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License (WTFPL)]]; read
-about this choice [[/writings/non-copylefted][here]].  There may be cases with other licenses.  The status of
+about this choice [[/writings/licensing][here]]  There may be cases with other licenses.  The status of
 a page can be seen in the bottom in a metadata box.  If no license is specified
 in the box, it's either because I forgot to apply one to the page, or it's
 because the page has almost no content (like the "Page not found" page) and does

site/index.org

@@ -24,9 +24,10 @@ visit it (why not?), here's the author's pick of metanohi pages you should read:
 
 * Important note
 
-This website is very broken.  However, you probably won't notice it.  Just keep
+This website is very broken (though its structural design is pretty ok).
-in mind that the code running this site is unmaintained and poor; see for
+However, you probably won't notice it.  Just keep in mind that the code running
-yourself at <@eval macros.titlelink('/projects/mege')@>.
+this site is unmaintained and poor; see for yourself at <@eval
+macros.titlelink('/projects/mege')@>.
 
 [fn:evenmore] Not just a lot, but A LOT[fn:alot]
 

site/writings/licensing.org

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+#+title: Licensing on metanohi
+#&summary
+What's up with all that stuff?
+#&
+#+startup: showall
+#+license: wtfpl
+
+Previous opinion: macros.titlelink('/writings/non-copylefted')@>.
+
+* Licensing on metanohi
+
+I usually just use the Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License, Version 2
+from [[http://wtfpl.net/]]:
+
+#+BEGIN_SRC
+        DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE 
+                    Version 2, December 2004 
+
+ Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net> 
+
+ Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified 
+ copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long 
+ as the name is changed. 
+
+            DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE 
+   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 
+
+  0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
+#+END_SRC
+
+
+* Reason
+
+I got tired of software licenses.  I don't mind them, and I don't have anything
+against copyleft -- it's a tool, and it can be effective in some cases -- but
+for my own projects, I just want to publish something that people can use.
+
+I still ask for attribution, but I do it in a nice way, and not with the
+implicit threat of a license.  If someone doesn't attribute me, it makes no
+difference to me whether they have to because of a license; I'm not going to do
+anything about it anyway.
+
+I guess that some people consider e.g. CC BY-SA a recognizable symbol and that
+its law stuff is secondary.  I can follow that thought, but I just got tired of
+it.
+
+Some might not want to integrate WTFPL code into their project, but fuck them.
+
+All that being said, I will work in any free software and free culture project
+no matter what license they use.  WTFPL is just for my junk.

site/writings/non-copylefted.org

@@ -5,6 +5,12 @@ Why I don't use copyleft for my own works.
 #+startup: showall
 #+license: wtfpl
 
+#&+classes=warning
+This old opinion is somewhat verbose and, well, old.  See <@eval
+macros.titlelink('/writings/licensing')@> for my current opinion.  Why do I
+keep changing opinions?  Ugh...
+#&
+
 * My works, non-copylefted
 
 A few months ago, I went from using the GPL for most of my software to BSD3;