Minor.

site/writings/ordfinder/index.org

@@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ word whose length does not exceed 8 characters, although it is a bit slow.
 But why not more than 8 characters? My view of memory might have been a bit
 naive back then, because the first step in my algorithm is to generate and
 store all permutations of all subsequences of the given word. That is, if the
-string is "me", my program stores the array `{ "m", "e", "me", "em" }` in
+string is "me", my program stores the array ={ "m", "e", "me", "em" }= in
 memory before going on to reading the dictionary and looking for matches.
 
-If the string is "you", the program stores `{ "y", "o", "yo", "oy", "u", "yu",
+If the string is "you", the program stores ={ "y", "o", "yo", "oy", "u", "yu",
-"uy", "ou", "uo", "you", "yuo", "oyu", "ouy", "uyo", "uoy" }`.
+"uy", "ou", "uo", "you", "yuo", "oyu", "ouy", "uyo", "uoy" }=.
 
 If the string is "computer", the program stores the 109600 permutations of the
 subsequences of "computer".
@@ -51,11 +51,11 @@ Note that this code doesn't actually compile, because of all the wrong
 code. However, it did compile back in 2008 which means that either I added the
 wrong code after I had compiled it, or I used an overfriendly compiler (I don't
 remember which compiler it was, but it ran on Windows). I have run the old
-executable with `wine`, and that works.
+executable with ~wine~, and that works.
 
 It's not necesarry to know C to laugh at this code, but it helps.
 
-We'll start with some basic `#include`s.
+We'll start with some basic ~#include~s.
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC c
 #include <stdio.h>
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ char os[0],s[0],r[0],t[0];
 int l,c,rc,k,sk,i,ii,iii,ri;
 #+END_SRC
 
-The next step is to define our own version of C's builtin `strstr` function
+The next step is to define our own version of C's builtin ~strstr~ function
 (almost). I was used to PHP, so I wanted the same return values as PHP's
-`strpos`.
+~strpos~.
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC c
 int strpos (const char *haystack, const char *needle) {
@@ -116,9 +116,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  }
 #+END_SRC
 
-Wait, what? We use `strcpy` to copy the string `argv[1]`, which contains the
+Wait, what? We use ~strcpy~ to copy the string ~argv[1]~, which contains the
-word we want to permute, into the statically allocated `os` with length 0? Or we
+word we want to permute, into the statically allocated ~os~ with length 0? Or we
-read a line from standard in and save in `os`? And almost the same for `s`?
+read a line from standard in and save in ~os~? And almost the same for ~s~?
 That's... not good.
 
 At least these two lines aren't that bad.
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ dynamically-generated ints as lengths?
  char ra[rc][l+1];
 #+END_SRC
 
-And then some more assignments and `while` loops...
+And then some more assignments and ~while~ loops...
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC c
  ri=0;
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ This formula does something. I'm not sure what.
  ca[ii]=floor(i/pow(l,l-ii-1))-floor(i/pow(l,l-ii))*l;
 #+END_SRC
 
-More `while` loops, now also with `if` statements.
+More ~while~ loops, now also with ~if~ statements.
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC c
  iii=0;
@@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ More `while` loops, now also with `if` statements.
  strncpy(t,s+ca[ii],1);
 #+END_SRC
 
-Let's concatenate `t` onto `ra[ri]`, a string which hardly exists due to the
+Let's concatenate ~t~ onto ~ra[ri]~, a string which hardly exists due to the
-`char ra[rc][l+1];` magic above.
+~char ra[rc][l+1];~ magic above.
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC c
  strcat(ra[ri],t);
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ Let's concatenate `t` onto `ra[ri]`, a string which hardly exists due to the
 #+END_SRC
 
 And why not concatenate an end-of-string mark onto a string which, if it
-doesn't have an end-of-string mark, will make `strcat` fail miserably?
+doesn't have an end-of-string mark, will make ~strcat~ fail miserably?
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC c
  strcat(ra[ri],"\0");
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ And then more junk.
  //printf("\nOrd: %s\nOrdl\x91ngde: %d\nOrdkombinationer: %d\n",os,l,ri);
 #+END_SRC
 
-Phew... At this point, I'm certain that `ra` is supposed to be an array of all
+Phew... At this point, I'm certain that ~ra~ is supposed to be an array of all
 word permutations. So let's open our dictionary "ord.txt" and look for matches.
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ end-of-string mark.
  while (ii<ri && k==0) {
 #+END_SRC
 
-The magical core of the matching logic, using our own `strpos`:
+The magical core of the matching logic, using our own ~strpos~:
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC c
  if (strpos(ra[ii],wrd)>-1) {k=1;}
@@ -357,9 +357,9 @@ fun nPermutations len = foldl op+ 0 (map (fn n => factorial n * binomc len n)
                                          (upTo 1 len))
 
 (* Gives the size in bytes for storing all word subsequence permutations for a
- * given word length in a space-saving way: there are `len` arrays, each taking
+ * given word length in a space-saving way: there are ~len~ arrays, each taking
  * up space for the pointer to the array and the permutations of subsequences of
- * length n where `1 <= n <= len` and n is unique.
+ * length n where ~1 <= n <= len~ and n is unique.
  *)
 fun nSize len = 8 * len + foldl op+ 0 (
                 map (fn n => (n + 1) * factorial n * binomc len n)

site/writings/sound-programming/index.org

@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
 #+startup: showall
 #&toc
 
+* Sound Programming
+
 Much can be programmed, and that includes sound. In the digital world, sound is
 typically represented by sequences of about 90 kB per second, so "printing"
 sound is merely a matter of printing bytes. As such, any general purpose

site/writings/stumpwm.org

@@ -3,9 +3,12 @@
 How I've set up StumpWM on Trisquel
 #&
 #+license: wtfpl
+#+startup: showall
 
 * My StumpWM setup
 
+GNOME
+
 I use StumpWM instead of e.g. Gnome. StumpWM is a tiling window manager, which
 means that it's a good window manager.