2014-08-02 10:21:59 +02:00
|
|
|
#+title: Licensing on metanohi
|
|
|
|
#&summary
|
|
|
|
What's up with all that stuff?
|
|
|
|
#&
|
|
|
|
#+startup: showall
|
|
|
|
#+license: wtfpl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Licensing on metanohi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I usually just use the Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License, Version 2
|
|
|
|
from [[http://wtfpl.net/]]:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC
|
|
|
|
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
|
|
|
|
Version 2, December 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified
|
|
|
|
copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long
|
|
|
|
as the name is changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
|
|
|
|
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
|
|
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-20 21:26:30 +02:00
|
|
|
I think the license is fun, and there really is no good reason to use anything
|
|
|
|
else for most of my small, one-off projects. For larger projects, I use BSD2 or
|
|
|
|
BSD3 or whatever -- I accept all free software licenses and really do not wish
|
|
|
|
to discuss them that much (although I admit that I have previously been more
|
|
|
|
opionated).
|
2014-08-02 10:21:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-20 21:26:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Some reasons
|
2014-08-02 10:21:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-02 10:29:06 +02:00
|
|
|
I got tired of software and culture licenses. I don't mind them, and I don't
|
|
|
|
have anything against copyleft -- it's a tool, and it can be effective in some
|
|
|
|
cases -- but for my own projects, I just want to publish something that people
|
|
|
|
can use.
|
2014-08-02 10:21:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I still ask for attribution, but I do it in a nice way, and not with the
|
|
|
|
implicit threat of a license. If someone doesn't attribute me, it makes no
|
|
|
|
difference to me whether they have to because of a license; I'm not going to do
|
|
|
|
anything about it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that some people consider e.g. CC BY-SA a recognizable symbol and that
|
|
|
|
its law stuff is secondary. I can follow that thought, but I just got tired of
|
|
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-20 21:26:30 +02:00
|
|
|
Some people might not want to integrate WTFPL code into their project, but fuck
|
|
|
|
them (okay, in practice I'll probably just relicense to BSD2 or BSD3 if
|
|
|
|
necessary).
|
2014-08-02 10:21:59 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All that being said, I will work in any free software and free culture project
|
2015-02-14 16:38:01 +01:00
|
|
|
no matter what license they use. WTFPL is just for my own junk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Copyright in general
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a fan of copyright as it is right now, but I don't know if it should be
|
|
|
|
removed alltogether (if that was even possible...). I think it would be nice if
|
|
|
|
copyright was only for commercial use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I used to have a lot of text about this, but I've come to just not care. It's
|
2016-04-20 21:26:30 +02:00
|
|
|
all in the git history if you want to dig it up and read it.
|