2011-07-26 03:04:17 +02:00
|
|
|
#+title: Atem: a new word
|
2011-07-27 02:44:23 +02:00
|
|
|
#&summary
|
|
|
|
|
A presentation of the new word 'atem' and why it's so desperately needed
|
|
|
|
|
#&
|
2013-02-08 16:47:53 +01:00
|
|
|
#+license: wtfpl
|
2013-02-10 17:58:53 +01:00
|
|
|
#+startup: showall
|
2011-07-26 03:04:17 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-27 02:44:23 +02:00
|
|
|
* Atem: a new word
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have you ever checked the Wiktionary entry for 'meta'? I have. It's right
|
|
|
|
|
[[http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/meta#English][here]]. When I looked at it, I noticed that there were no antonyms. *None!*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#+caption: This alien agrees.
|
|
|
|
|
#&img;url=/img/aliens/lulala.png,float=right,width=200
|
|
|
|
|
I often find it useful to be able to un-metaize complex thoughts: instead of
|
|
|
|
|
thinking about thinking (meta-thinking), I think. Nothing else. However, when I
|
|
|
|
|
mention that "I think", it may not be obvious that before I was thinking, I was
|
|
|
|
|
thinking about thinking, which is why I have chosen to create *atem*, a new
|
|
|
|
|
word whose only function is to act as meta's antonym. With this word, I can now
|
|
|
|
|
say that "I atem-think", meaning "I think because I thought of thinking", or I
|
|
|
|
|
can say that "I think", meaning "I think". 'atem' removes a lot of ambiguity
|
|
|
|
|
from the English language.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, maybe not that often, but sometimes it's useful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, *atem* could be quite useful in abstract definitions, as a way to focus
|
|
|
|
|
on making something abstract concrete instead of making something concrete
|
|
|
|
|
abstract. For example, this page is probably an atem-page, because somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
out there there's a page about this page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps every object in existence could be considered an atem object. It's not
|
|
|
|
|
impossible, it just doesn't make much sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still, this word could be useful. I hope it gets into a dictionary.
|
2012-02-11 18:17:41 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Update, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just found out that I'm not the only one who at some point found the lack of
|
|
|
|
|
a meta antonym strange and annoying. Naturally, I can't rely on Wiktionary to
|
|
|
|
|
give me the latest opinions on language extensions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A recent internet search for "meta antonym" gave me several links to pages
|
|
|
|
|
where other people discussed the need. Someone have even proposed the word
|
|
|
|
|
"mesa". I don't care if the new antonym becomes "atem", "mesa" (which I guess
|
|
|
|
|
has nothing to do with [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesa_(computer_graphics)][this Mesa]]), or something else --- I just want it to
|
|
|
|
|
exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
